A reigning UFC world champion explains why he believes that girls shouldn’t be allowed to vote, however MMA followers are getting uninterested in the schtick. Sean Strickland is again on social media with one other argument towards ladies having the fitting to vote, saying he believes ladies are “far too compassionate” to control a functioning society.
The UFC middleweight champion addressed the backlash to his earlier feedback in a publish shared on X. Strickland insisted his opinion was not rooted in intelligence, saying he believes a lady could at the moment maintain the very best IQ on the earth. His level, he stated, was that girls are extra inclined towards compassion in circumstances the place he feels society wants harder solutions.
“I’m not saying ladies are silly,” Strickland, the UFC champion, wrote. “I believe the very best IQ proper now could be a lady. Ladies are far too compassionate to rule a functioning society.”
Strickland then argued that girls would battle to simply accept that some offenders can’t be rehabilitated. He claimed there are individuals who current such a hazard that the one choices must be execution or everlasting incarceration. The fighter didn’t establish a selected case within the publish.
“Ladies won’t ever settle for that there are a bunch of f*cking unhealthy folks on this planet, you can’t assist them,” Strickland continued. “The one path for them is both execution or everlasting incarceration. For some cause ladies simply can not grasp that idea.”
Sean Strickland Doubles Down on Ladies Voting Take
The remarks add to an extended historical past of Strickland making headlines with opinions about women, politics and social points. Earlier than his June 2023 UFC principal occasion towards Abus Magomedov, Strickland advised reporters that permitting ladies to vote was the place society “f***ed up.” He additionally stated ladies ought to depart the workforce and return to the kitchen, arguing that one man ought to be capable of work, earn sufficient to help a household and permit kids to be raised at dwelling.
On the time, Strickland framed his feedback round household life, wages and what he sees as a decline in American tradition. He stated he wished to return to an earlier model of society, whereas including feedback about immigration and the U.S. border wall. His newest clarification modifications the angle barely: as an alternative of specializing in the workforce, he’s now presenting ladies’s supposed compassion as the explanation they need to be excluded from voting.
Strickland has repeatedly blurred the road between battle promotion, private views and on-line provocation. The middleweight contender has beforehand drawn criticism for feedback about ladies’s MMA as nicely. In 2024, ladies’s flyweight champion Valentina Shevchenko stated Strickland had apologized after making derogatory feedback about feminine fighters. Nonetheless, his public feedback have continued, and he repeated dismissive remarks about ladies’s sports activities in 2026.
Strickland’s publish doesn’t provide proof for the declare that girls are inherently unable to make choices involving public security, legal justice or authorities. Ladies vote, function judges, prosecutors, lawmakers, law enforcement officials, army leaders and heads of presidency internationally. His feedback as an alternative mirror his private view that punishment and social order require a stage of severity he doesn’t affiliate with ladies.
MMA Followers Are Not Amused
Some UFC followers are beginning to present fatigue with Strickland’s fixed stream of controversial posts, arguing that the middleweight champion has leaned too arduous into saying surprising issues since his profile grew. One critic wrote, “I appreciated Sean extra when he didn’t should say silly sh-t for consideration each week. That one press convention when folks began listening to him bought him addicted.”
That frustration has surfaced round his battle promotion too. When Strickland just lately resumed buying and selling insults with Khamzat Chimaev forward of a doable rematch, followers questioned whether or not the hostility was real after their earlier feud ended with mutual respect, an embrace and Strickland acknowledging that among the pre-fight drama was meant to promote the bout. Feedback included, “We ain’t falling for that faux beef shit once more huge dawg,” whereas others stated they had been extra inquisitive about a special title challenger than one other spherical of on-line sparring.
Strickland’s politics have change into simply as unpredictable as his social-media feed. Though he has described himself as “America first” and beforehand voted for Donald Trump, a detailed pal of the UFC, he has since turned sharply on the president, arguing that Trump’s choices have damage unusual Individuals. Throughout an appearance on “The Shawn Ryan Present,” Strickland stated attending a Trump rally made him really feel he may “positively see how Hitler occurred,” claiming some MAGA supporters would observe Trump’s directions with out query.
His on-line position has additionally raised questions on whether or not he’s driving the outrage or getting used to amplify it. In Might, the UFC Champ Strickland introduced he had switched from Harley-Davidson to Indian Motorbike, accusing Harley of supporting “radical ideology” involving kids. The publish appeared alongside related anti-Harley messages from pro-Trump accounts that promoted Indian Motorbike utilizing intently matched language, together with references to the corporate’s a hundred and twenty fifth anniversary and the approaching 250th anniversary of america. The episode left critics calling him a “helpful fool” or a paid shill, somebody whose willingness to leap into culture-war fights could make him an efficient instrument for another person’s advertising plan.
