The talk round India’s future management has intensified after former England spinner questioned whether or not Shubman Gill is able to shoulder the duty of being India’s all-format captain. Whereas acknowledging Gill’s immense batting expertise, the ex-cricketer believes the younger star lacks the depth and psychological edge required to guide the nationwide aspect persistently throughout Assessments, ODIs, and T20Is.
Former cricketer questions Shubman Gill’s temperament for management throughout codecs
Talking candidly, Monty Panesar argued that captaincy on the highest stage calls for greater than runs and approach. In response to him, Gill’s method underneath stress typically drifts towards complacency, one thing that would change into a legal responsibility when mixed with the tactical and emotional calls for of management. The previous left-arm spinner pressured that being an all-format captain in fashionable cricket is an “all-consuming function” that solely a handful of gamers can actually handle.
Panesar drew a pointy comparability between Gill and former India captain Virat Kohli, extensively thought to be one among India’s most intense leaders. He identified that Kohli’s aggression, power, and relentless requirements had been seen whatever the format or match scenario, setting a benchmark for management.
“He’s a complacent cricketer. He has a number of expertise, however he begins enjoying lazy pictures within the sport. Virat Kohli’s depth and aggression are evident in all codecs. Shubman Gill can’t try this. It’s an excessive amount of burden for him. He can’t be the captain of all codecs,” Panesar stated, as quoted by India At the moment.
In response to Panesar, the difficulty is just not Gill’s ability set however the extra psychological load that comes with management. He urged that piling captaincy obligations throughout codecs may dilute Gill’s batting focus, probably stalling his development as a premier batter.
Additionally READ: Top 5 contenders for the 2025 ICC Cricketer of the Year Award
Issues over India’s red-ball construction
Past particular person management, Panesar additionally highlighted deeper structural points inside Indian cricket, significantly within the red-ball format. He believes India remains to be a ways away from rebuilding a dominant Check aspect, citing a widening hole between home cricket and the worldwide stage.
Panesar emphasised that the transition from the Ranji Trophy to Check cricket stays steep, with four-day cricket demanding endurance, self-discipline, and sustained arduous work. He additional famous that monetary and structural challenges in home red-ball cricket have an effect on participant motivation. With Check cricket and home four-day competitions providing much less monetary incentive in comparison with T20 leagues, sustaining focus and dedication turns into tougher for rising gamers.
“Indian gamers are usually not prepared for Check cricket. Gamers who do effectively in T20s and ODIs don’t essentially carry out in Assessments. The hole between the Ranji Trophy and the Indian Check group is large. 4-day cricket takes arduous work and endurance. Check cricket pays much less, and that impacts focus. The Ranji Trophy system is weak in the meanwhile. India will want endurance to make a correct comeback in Check cricket,” added Panesar.
Additionally READ: Monty Panesar predicts the semifinalists of T20 World Cup 2026
