Former IPL chairman Lalit Modi has as soon as once more stirred debate across the league, this time elevating critical issues about its present construction. In line with him, the match is shedding huge income by not following the standard home-and-away format that was initially envisioned.
Lalit Modi questions present IPL format
Modi’s argument revolves round a easy however highly effective thought – fewer matches imply much less earnings. Because the IPL expanded to 10 groups in 2022, a whole home-and-away system would ideally lead to a 94-match season. Nevertheless, the BCCI has continued with a shortened 74-match format, utilizing a grouping system as a substitute.
This distinction of 20 matches, Modi claims, is costing the league closely. Based mostly on present media rights valuations – roughly ₹118 crore per match – the IPL is probably lacking out on round ₹2,400 crore in income each season. It’s not simply the board that takes a success; franchises are affected as nicely.
Below the IPL’s revenue-sharing mannequin, earnings from media rights are break up equally between the BCCI and the groups. Which means every franchise could possibly be shedding a big share yearly. Modi estimates that each staff stands to overlook out on roughly ₹120 crore due to the lowered variety of video games.
Additionally READ: In pics – Meet Tanvi Shah, the glamorous girl in Gujarat Titans for IPL 2026
“That’s not what we offered”: Modi raises issues on IPL contracts
Past the monetary angle, Modi additionally raised a extra critical subject — whether or not the present format aligns with the unique commitments made when the IPL was conceptualized and offered to stakeholders.
“That’s not what we offered,” he mentioned, stating that the league was constructed on the promise of a full home-and-away format the place every staff performs each different staff twice. He believes this construction was not only a choice however a basic a part of the IPL’s business mannequin.
“It’s a contractual obligation, given the charges they’re paying, to supply them with home-and-away fixtures,” he added, suggesting that deviating from this format may increase questions amongst stakeholders.
Modi additionally expressed doubts about whether or not all events concerned had agreed to the present construction. “Has all people signed off on this? I assure they haven’t,” he remarked, indicating that there could also be disagreements behind the scenes.
He dismissed widespread justifications similar to scheduling challenges and participant workload as inadequate causes to maneuver away from the unique plan. In his view, these are merely “excuses,” and the actual worth of the IPL lies in sustaining the integrity of its full format.
Apparently, Modi’s criticism comes at a time when IPL franchises are reaching file valuations. Current offers involving groups like Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) and Rajasthan Royals (RCB) have highlighted the league’s huge monetary attraction. Whereas Modi acknowledged this development, he insisted that the IPL remains to be not working at its full potential.
In line with him, increasing the season to incorporate all 94 matches wouldn’t solely get well the estimated income loss but additionally additional enhance the worth of franchises.
Additionally READ: IPL 2026 – Who is Ananya Birla? Meet the sister of RCB’s new chairman
