West Indies head coach Daren Sammy has confronted disciplinary motion from the Worldwide Cricket Council (ICC), receiving a positive and a demerit level after brazenly criticizing third umpire’s resolution throughout the first Test against Australia in Bridgetown, Barbados. The incident, which unfolded throughout play on Day 2, noticed the previous West Indies captain categorical important issues over a sequence of controversial choices that constantly went in opposition to his workforce.
Sammy’s candid remarks to reporters highlighted his frustration with what he perceived as inconsistent umpiring requirements, particularly concentrating on TV umpire Adrian Holdstock. He publicly questioned whether or not the official harboured any bias in opposition to the West Indies facet, a sentiment born from a string of contentious rulings all through the match. His feedback shortly garnered consideration, resulting in a right away investigation by the ICC.
As a direct consequence of his actions, the charismatic coach has been handed a penalty of 15 % of his match payment. Along with the financial sanction, Sammy has additionally incurred one demerit level on his disciplinary report. This measure underscores the ICC’s stringent stance on sustaining the integrity of match officers and upholding the Code of Conduct.
Daren Sammy breaches ICC’s Code of Conduct
The ICC confirmed that Sammy was discovered to be in breach of Article 2.7 of the ICC Code of Conduct. This explicit article pertains to “public criticism of, or inappropriate remark in relation to an incident occurring in a global match or any participant, participant help personnel, match official or workforce taking part in any worldwide match.” The ruling emphasizes the accountability of people in management positions inside cricket to chorus from public feedback that would undermine the authority or impartiality of officers.
Sammy’s outburst was triggered by a sample of rulings from the TV umpire, which included at the least 5 extremely debatable choices over the course of the primary two days of the Take a look at. These contentious calls arguably had a fabric influence on the stream of the sport, doubtlessly influencing the end result in opposition to the house workforce.
Whereas the frustration of coaches and gamers is comprehensible, the ICC stays agency on its coverage to guard the sanctity of officiating and the game’s international picture. The West Indies workforce will now proceed the sequence with their coach carrying a demerit level, an element that would result in extra extreme penalties if additional breaches happen sooner or later.
Additionally READ: WI vs AUS – Daren Sammy lashes out at umpire Holdstock’s controversial calls during the tense Bridgetown Test
Sammy’s rationale: Questions umpire’s consistency
Addressing the media following the day’s play, Sammy articulated the workforce’s want for better consistency in umpiring. “You don’t need to get your self in a scenario the place you’re questioning about sure umpires. Is there one thing in opposition to this workforce?” Sammy said, not shying away from his issues. The 41-year-old additional elaborated, “However while you see resolution after resolution, then it raises the query. I do know he’s right here for the sequence. You don’t need to go in a Take a look at match having that doubt.”
The coach additionally revealed that his apprehension relating to Holdstock’s officiating was not new, suggesting a perceived sample stretching again to the West Indies’ sequence in opposition to England. This historical past, in accordance with Sammy, fuelled his public questioning of the umpire’s choices and consistency.
Additionally READ: Roston Chase lashes out at umpiring standards after West Indies’ crushing defeat to Australia in the first Test
