Employed in 2020, Thibodeau went 226-174 with the Knicks. He turned the primary coach since Mike Woodson (2012-14) to finish his tenure with a profitable report and elevated a franchise that had been irrelevant for many of the 2010s.
Whereas Thibodeau ought to be celebrated for what he completed, together with main New York to the Japanese Convention Finals for the primary time since 2000, the Knicks wanted to make this transfer.
The workforce has a proficient core, and it is truthful to surprise if Thibodeau acquired it so far as he might.
Regardless of being thought of one of many sport’s high defensive-minded coaches, the Knicks could not cease the Pacers of their six-game sequence loss, permitting 116.8 factors per sport.
With the workforce’s greatest stars, level guard Jalen Brunson and middle Karl-Anthony Cities, struggling defensively, Thibodeau’s fashion did not mesh with the workforce’s high expertise.
The Knicks want a coach who can maximize their offensive strengths whereas minimizing their defensive liabilities. With a finite variety of seasons as a bonafide contender, they could not watch for (or count on) Thibodeau, 67, to change into that coach.
Thibodeau additionally relied extra closely on his starters than every other coach, taxing the unit with substantial minutes. That wear-and-tear is not sustainable, and New York’s starters would possible have been subjected to the identical utilization in 2025-26 below Thibodeau.
The choice might backfire, however with some wonderful candidates available on the market, together with lately fired former champion head coaches Michael Malone and Mike Budenholzer, plus youthful former Grizzlies coach Taylor Jenkins, New York has intriguing choices to get the group again to the NBA Finals.
It is cheap to be skeptical of the Knicks, who we have grown accustomed to seeing get issues mistaken extra usually than they get it proper.
Thibodeau’s firing comes with dangers, however sustaining the established order would have had its personal penalties.
As an alternative of taking the identical method and anticipating a unique end result, New York is attempting one thing completely different. What’s so loopy about that?
